Corporate Governance Five Years After Sarbanes-Oxley: Is There Real Change?
The Corporate Governance Five Years After Sarbanes-Oxley: Is There Real Change? issue features scholarship from the participants of a symposium held in April 2007 at New York Law School, which examined the implications of Sarbanes-Oxley five years after its enactment. The scholarship examines topics such as social defense for Sarbanes-Oxley, executive compensation, federal versus state corporate governance and CEO succession.
- Foreword, Faith Stevelman
- Sarbanes-Oxley: The Delaware Perspective, Chief Justice Myron T. Steele
- A Social Defense of Sarbanes-Oxley, James Fanto
- From Lapdog to Watchdog: Sarbanes-Oxley Section 307 and a New Role for Corporate Lawyers, Peter C. Kostant
- Disney Examined: A Case Study in Corporate Goverance and CEO Succession, Lawrence Lederman
- Two Goals for Executive Compensation Reform, Brett H. McDonnell
- SEC Enforcement and Examinations Concerning Hedge Funds, Barry W. Rashkover and Laurin Blumenthal Kleiman
- Internal Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Section 806: Balancing the Interests of Employee and Employer, Kevin Rubinstein
- Zaranska v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Bethany L. Ow